Bowman and Brooke Logo
Daniel B. Goldman

Daniel B. Goldman


Daniel Goldman concentrates his practice on product liability, premises liability and commercial litigation for Fortune 500 clients throughout the country. His natural ability to effectively communicate with clients, general counsel, opposing counsel and co-counsel makes him an invaluable asset to any trial team he is a member of.

Dan has represented multi-national clients in Arizona, California and Illinois, managing all aspects of a case, from the initial pleading phases through resolution. He has significant experience drafting and arguing motions in court, including motions for summary judgment, motions on pleadings and discovery motions. He also routinely takes and defends corporate witness and expert depositions, researches complex legal issues and conducts mediations and arbitrations. 

Dan is admitted to practice as a patent attorney with the U.S. Patent and Trademark office and previously maintained a private practice where he counseled clients regarding intellectual property strategies, prosecuted patents, litigated contract disputes, assisted with real estate closings and filed tax assessment appeals.  He has also worked as a court-appointed mediator.

Bar Admissions

  • Arizona, 2017
  • California, 2014
  • Illinois, 2008

Court Admissions

  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. District Court, Central District of California
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office


  • Chicago-Kent College of Law, J.D., 2008

    Contributing Editor, Seventh Circuit Law Review

    Associate Editor, Journal of Intellectual Property Law

    Vice President, Chicago-Kent Intellectual Property Law Society

    President, Chicago-Kent Chapter of the Decalogue Society of Lawyers

  • University of Illinois, B.S., 2004

    James Scholar

    National Merit Scholar

Speaking Engagements

  • “AZ Update on Product Liability Law,” Co-Presenter, ACC Arizona CLE Luncheon, July 2019


  • "The Protection of Trade Secrets from Disclosure Via FOIA Requests," Seventh Circuit Law Review, May 2008